The Ghana Revenue Authority has declared its choice to start the operationalization of the E-demand from May 1 in an adjusted staged approach.
This follows the aftereffects of an evaluation completed by the GRA to test the overall availability of some accusing substances to coordinate the E-Levy the board framework.
The new improvement is an obstacle in the Authority’s arrangement to completely execute the E-demand by May 1.
Recently, Ningo-Prampram MP, Sam George Nartey, had expressed that the Authority was not prepared to carry out the Electronic Transaction Levy (E-demand) notwithstanding it saying something else.
As per him, processes that will guarantee the viable run of the questionable assessment have still not been finished.
The Ningo-Prampram MP noticed that the way things are, the Application Programming Interface (API) and the security engineering have not been made accessible to the media communications organizations (Telcos).
“I can talk on the power that as at close of day as late as 11 pm the previous evening (Wednesday), when the Commissioner-General for the GRA says all the APIs have been given to all Electronic Money Issuers (EMI) is wrong. No less than two APIs are as yet exceptional,” he said.
“Basic among the two is the inversion API. The GRA at the last specialized gathering conceded that since all the power tests have not been finished for the framework, there’s a plausible of vacations where when you make a phone call to the API to do everything the checks before duty is applied or not applied, and it’s conceivable that you won’t finish the checks progressively.
He made sense of that GRA has concluded that when such a circumstance emerges “feel free to apply the assessment, even though that exchange is absolved, and afterward in this way when the framework returns online we would do a compromise and afterward do the inversion of the 1.5 that was charged.”
He expressed that this is probably going to make issues, including the probability of starting disarray at Mobile cash distributing focuses.
“The correspondence has gone out there that this class of people is absolved [and] with cases like this, momo specialists will be gone after because purchasers will blame them for attempting to take their 1.5 of the cash sent. So you’re uncovering the momo specialist to conceivable specialist in light of an absence of appropriate correspondence, ” he said.
He additionally expressed that this likewise demonstrates that the implementers are not prepared to do any inversion in such examples.
“You have not given any course of events for this compromise. So nobody knows when the inversion will be finished. Furthermore, basic everything is that the APIs that will permit the EMIs and the PSPs to do the inversion have not been given to them. This demonstrates that the public authority isn’t prepared to do any inversion for wrong exchanges,” he said.